Which publishers have implemented ads.txt?

digital-link-landing-page-ads-txt.png

The IAB's ads.txt project aims to improve transparency in programmatic. But not every publisher has adopted the technology.

Pixalate has crawled more than 7 million domains to determine which publishers are using ads.txt. 

Fill out the form to download the full list of publishers that have implemented ads.txt, as measured by Pixalate. This list is updated as of December 31, 2018.

Download the Full List
pixalate-logo-red-small
Copyright © 2024 Pixalate
UK Phone: +44 (0)800 011 2050
US Phone: +1 888 749 2528
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Terms of Use  Privacy Policy  Join ATSAPI Slack Channel

Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.

Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”